Metabolic Health

Which Supplements Actually Improve Your Lipid Panel?

A look at the supplements with genuine human trial evidence behind them, at what they actually move and by how much, and, just as importantly, at a well-known supplement that improves lipid numbers on paper but has twice failed to reduce cardiovascular events when tested.

What This Covers

Adjuncts, Not Replacements, When a Statin Is Indicated

The agents below all have real, published human data showing an effect on LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, or both. None of them is presented here as a substitute for a statin or other guideline-directed therapy when your risk profile calls for one; they're best understood as adjuncts, useful for patients with mild-to-moderate elevations who want additional non-pharmacologic support, patients who are statin-intolerant, or patients already on a statin who want to address a triglyceride or LDL gap that remains. Every ingredient below is discussed on its own evidence, independent of any specific brand or product; a note on sourcing and quality appears near the end, since it matters at least as much as which ingredient you choose.

How Strong Is the Evidence

Evidence Summary

At a Glance
Bergamot Human RCT data (n=77), one open-label, placebo-controlled trial showing meaningful LDL and total cholesterol reduction alone, with a significantly greater effect when added to rosuvastatin than rosuvastatin alone. Mechanism plausibly overlaps with statin-like HMG-CoA reductase modulation; open-label design is a real limitation on precision, not on direction.
Berberine Meta-analysis of multiple RCTs showing modest, statistically significant LDL and triglyceride reduction, alongside its established glycemic effects. Authors note meaningful heterogeneity across the underlying trials.
Plant sterols and stanols The most extensively studied of the seven, a meta-analysis of 124 studies (201 strata), dose-dependent LDL reduction (6-12%) that plateaus around 3 g/day at an average of 12%. Sterols and stanols show comparable effects when analyzed separately. Endorsed as adjunct therapy in major lipid guidelines.
Psyllium and soluble fiber Meta-analysis of 28 RCTs (n=1924) at a median ~10.2 g/day showing significant reductions in LDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol, and apoB, graded moderate to high quality by GRADE. One of the few agents here with an FDA-recognized health claim.
Omega-3 fatty acids Strong, but not uniform, evidence. Prescription-strength icosapent ethyl has outcome-trial evidence (fewer cardiovascular events, not just better numbers); over-the-counter fish oil has real triglyceride-lowering data but a meaningfully lower evidence bar, and DHA-containing formulations can modestly raise LDL.
Aged garlic extract Real, but modest, effect. A 19-trial meta-analysis found statistically significant reductions in LDL-C (-4.41 mg/dL) and systolic blood pressure (-2.49 mmHg), with no significant effect on HDL or diastolic pressure; effects were more pronounced in patients with cardiovascular disease or hypercholesterolemia specifically.
Red yeast rice The largest LDL effect of any agent here, unsurprising since its active compound, monacolin K, is chemically identical to lovastatin. The caveat is not the physiology, it's the product: commercial potency is wildly inconsistent and quality control problems are documented, not theoretical.
Niacin (not included) Improves LDL, HDL, and triglyceride numbers, but two large randomized outcome trials (AIM-HIGH, n=3,414; HPS2-THRIVE, n=25,673) found no reduction in cardiovascular events when added to statin therapy, and HPS2-THRIVE also found a significant increase in serious adverse effects, including new-onset diabetes, infections, and bleeding. See the dedicated section below.
The Evidence

What Each Ingredient Actually Shows, and How Much

Bergamot: A Statin-Adjacent Mechanism With Real Human Data

Gliozzi M, Walker R, Muscoli S, Vitale C, Gratteri S, Carresi C, Musolino V, Russo V, Janda E, Ragusa S, Aloe A, Palma E, Muscoli C, Romeo F, Mollace V. "Bergamot polyphenolic fraction enhances rosuvastatin-induced effect on LDL-cholesterol, LOX-1 expression and protein kinase B phosphorylation in patients with hyperlipidemia." International Journal of Cardiology. 2013;170(2):140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.125. PMID: 24239156. Bergamot (Citrus bergamia) polyphenolic extract has been studied specifically for its overlap with statin pharmacology: several of its flavonoid constituents appear to modulate HMG-CoA reductase activity in a manner mechanistically adjacent to statins, alongside antioxidant effects on LDL particles themselves. In this prospective, open-label, placebo-controlled trial in 77 patients with elevated LDL-C and triglycerides, patients were randomized to placebo, rosuvastatin 10mg or 20mg daily, bergamot polyphenolic fraction (BPF) 1000mg daily alone, or BPF plus rosuvastatin 10mg daily, for 30 days. Both rosuvastatin doses and BPF alone reduced total cholesterol, LDL-C, and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio compared with placebo, and adding BPF to rosuvastatin produced a significantly greater lipid-lowering effect than rosuvastatin alone. The cholesterol reduction was accompanied by parallel reductions in markers of oxidative vascular damage (malondialdehyde, the oxidized-LDL receptor LOX-1, and phosphorylated protein kinase B), suggesting a vascular-protective effect beyond the lipid numbers themselves. Worth stating plainly: this trial was open-label, not double-blind, meaning both patients and investigators knew who was receiving what, a real limitation on how much confidence to place in the exact magnitude of effect even though the direction and statistical significance are genuine. The mechanistic overlap with statins is useful context on its own: this isn't an unrelated "natural alternative," it's a compound whose LDL-lowering pathway is plausibly related to the drug class it's often positioned against.

Berberine: Modest, Statistically Real, Best Known for Its Metabolic Effects

Ju J, Li J, Lin Q, Xu H. "Efficacy and safety of berberine for dyslipidaemias: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials." Phytomedicine. 2018;50:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.09.212. PMID: 30466986. This meta-analysis of randomized trials found berberine reduced LDL-C by a mean of 0.38 mmol/L and triglycerides by a mean of 0.28 mmol/L compared with control, both statistically significant. The authors were explicit that heterogeneity across the underlying trials was high and that risk of bias in some included studies was a real limitation, worth stating plainly rather than smoothing over. Berberine's lipid effect is best understood as one part of a broader metabolic action: it activates AMPK, the same cellular energy-sensing pathway targeted by metformin, which is why it shows glycemic benefits alongside its lipid effects and is most often reached for in patients with insulin resistance or mixed dyslipidemia rather than isolated high LDL.

Plant Sterols and Stanols: The Best-Studied Agent on This List

Ras RT, Geleijnse JM, Trautwein EA. "LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of plant sterols and stanols across different dose ranges: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies." British Journal of Nutrition. 2014;112(2):214-219. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000750. PMID: 24780090. PMCID: PMC4071994. Pooling 124 studies (201 strata, average plant sterol dose 2.1 g/day across a 0.2-9.0 g/day range), this meta-analysis found that plant sterol and stanol intake between 0.6 and 3.3 g/day reduced LDL-C by 6-12% on average, with the effect plateauing around 12% near 3 g/day. Sterols and stanols were analyzed separately as well as combined, and showed clear, comparable dose-response relationships, meaning this isn't just a pooled-together average masking two different effects. Doses above 4 g/day were too scarce and scattered across the available trials to pool reliably, so the dose-response curve above that point is less certain. This is the single largest evidence base of any agent in this guide, and it's why plant sterols and stanols are the one ingredient here explicitly endorsed as adjunct lipid therapy by major cardiology and lipid-society guidance, not just individual trials. The mechanism, competing with dietary and biliary cholesterol for absorption at the intestinal level, sits in the same functional family as ezetimibe, though through a different specific transporter interaction.

Psyllium and Soluble Fiber: An FDA-Recognized Health Claim

Jovanovski E, Yashpal S, Komishon A, Zurbau A, Blanco Mejia S, Ho HVT, Li D, Sievenpiper J, Duvnjak L, Vuksan V. "Effect of psyllium (Plantago ovata) fiber on LDL cholesterol and alternative lipid targets, non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2018;108(5):922-932. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy115. PMID: 30239559. This meta-analysis pooled 28 randomized controlled trials (n=1924) and found that at a median psyllium dose of about 10.2 g/day, LDL-C fell by a mean difference of 0.33 mmol/L (95% CI 0.27-0.38, P<0.00001), non-HDL cholesterol by 0.39 mmol/L (95% CI 0.27-0.50, P<0.00001), and apolipoprotein B, the particle-count measure some lipidologists consider a more accurate atherogenic marker than LDL-C alone, by 0.05 g/L (95% CI 0.03-0.08, P<0.0001). Using the GRADE framework, the authors rated the LDL-C and non-HDL-C findings as moderate-quality evidence (downgraded for inconsistency across trials) and the apoB finding as high-quality. Psyllium's mechanism is mechanical and well understood: as a viscous soluble fiber, it binds bile acids in the gut, increasing their fecal excretion and forcing the liver to pull more LDL out of circulation to synthesize replacement bile acids, upregulating LDL receptor activity in the process. It's also one of the few agents on this list with an FDA-recognized qualified health claim linking soluble fiber intake to reduced coronary heart disease risk, reflecting a genuinely mature evidence base.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids: A Real Divide Between Prescription and Over-the-Counter

Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA, Ketchum SB, Doyle RT Jr, Juliano RA, Jiao L, Granowitz C, Tardif JC, Ballantyne CM; for the REDUCE-IT Investigators. "Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia." New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380(1):11-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812792. PMID: 30415628. This is the one agent in this entire guide with genuine outcome-trial evidence: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (placebo was mineral oil) enrolled 8,179 patients on statin therapy with elevated triglycerides, 70.7% already established with cardiovascular disease. Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, prescription-strength icosapent ethyl (2g twice daily, a purified, high-dose EPA ethyl ester) reduced the composite cardiovascular endpoint, cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina, to 17.2% of patients versus 22.0% with placebo (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83, P<0.001), and cardiovascular death specifically was also significantly lower (4.3% vs 5.2%, hazard ratio 0.80, P=0.03). That is a fundamentally different, and stronger, category of evidence than a lipid-panel change alone. The trial's safety data belong in an honest accounting too: hospitalization for atrial fibrillation or flutter was more common with icosapent ethyl than placebo (3.1% vs 2.1%, P=0.004), and serious bleeding events trended higher without reaching statistical significance (2.7% vs 2.1%, P=0.06). Over-the-counter fish oil has real triglyceride-lowering data of its own: Eslick GD, Howe PR, Smith C, Priest R, Bensoussan A. "Benefits of fish oil supplementation in hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis." International Journal of Cardiology. 2009;136(1):4-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.092. PMID: 18774613. This meta-analysis found fish oil reduced triglycerides by a mean of 0.34 mmol/L (roughly 30 mg/dL) at a typical studied dose of about 3.25 g/day combined EPA and DHA, a real effect, but from a heterogeneous set of OTC-type trials rather than a single outcome-driven design. The American Heart Association's own science advisory on this topic (Skulas-Ray AC, Wilson PWF, Harris WS, et al. "Omega-3 Fatty Acids for the Management of Hypertriglyceridemia: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association." Circulation. 2019;140(12):e673-e691. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000709. PMID: 31422671) states plainly that patients should not attempt to self-treat significant hypertriglyceridemia with unregulated over-the-counter fish oil, both because dosing and purity are inconsistent and because the outcome evidence exists specifically for the prescription formulation, not the supplement aisle. Worth stating plainly for anyone comparing EPA-only versus mixed EPA/DHA products: DHA-containing formulations tend to raise LDL-C modestly in some patients, while EPA-only formulations tend to be LDL-neutral, so the choice of formulation matters, not just the dose.

Aged Garlic Extract: A Real but Modest Effect

Bashiri S, TaghipourSheshdeh F, Foshati S, Askarpour M, Ahmadi A, Babajafari S. "The Effect of Aged Garlic Supplementation on Blood Pressure and Lipid Profile: A Dose-Response GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." Phytotherapy Research. 2025;39(12):5669-5694. doi: 10.1002/ptr.70032. PMID: 40628369. Pooling 19 randomized controlled trials, this meta-analysis found aged garlic extract produced a statistically significant but modest reduction in both LDL-C (weighted mean difference -4.41 mg/dL, 95% CI -8.28 to -0.54, I²=55.78%) and systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference -2.49 mmHg, 95% CI -4.02 to -0.95, I²=29.76%), with no significant effect on HDL or diastolic blood pressure. Total cholesterol came close to, but didn't reach, statistical significance (-4.74 mg/dL, 95% CI -9.49 to 0.01, I²=74.84%), worth stating plainly rather than rounding up to a positive finding. Subgroup analysis found aged garlic had a significant effect on systolic blood pressure and triglycerides specifically in patients with existing cardiovascular disease, and on diastolic blood pressure specifically in patients with hypercholesterolemia, suggesting the effect may be more clinically meaningful in higher-risk subgroups than the pooled average alone suggests. Aged garlic's proposed mechanisms include improved nitric-oxide-mediated endothelial function and reduced oxidative modification of LDL particles, alongside mild antiplatelet effects worth knowing about for anyone already on an anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication. This is the most modest lipid effect of any agent covered here, best framed to patients as a genuine but small piece of a broader cardiovascular-support picture rather than a primary LDL-lowering strategy.

Red Yeast Rice: The Strongest Effect, and the Reason It Comes With a Caveat

Li P, Wang Q, Chen K, et al. "Red Yeast Rice for Hyperlipidemia: A Meta-Analysis of 15 High-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials." Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2022;12:819482. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.819482. PMID: 35111069. This meta-analysis found red yeast rice reduced LDL-C by a mean of 35.82 mg/dL compared with placebo, the largest single effect size of any agent in this guide. That's not surprising once the mechanism is stated plainly: red yeast rice's active compound, monacolin K, is chemically identical to lovastatin, a prescription statin. Patients considering it should understand it as a statin, pharmacologically, not as a distinct "natural" category. The caveat here is not about the physiology, which is genuinely established, it's about the product. Gordon RY, Cooperman T, Obermeyer W, Becker DJ. "Marked variability of monacolin levels in commercial red yeast rice products: buyer beware!" Archives of Internal Medicine. 2010;170(19):1722-1727. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.382. PMID: 20975018. This study tested 12 commercial red yeast rice products, all labeled 600 mg per capsule, and found monacolin K content ranging from 0.10 to 10.09 mg per capsule, more than a hundred-fold variability, with 4 of the 12 products showing elevated citrinin, a mycotoxin with documented kidney toxicity. A patient taking an inconsistently potent, unregulated version of a statin, without the monitoring that typically accompanies a prescription statin, is a real and specific risk, not a generic supplement-industry disclaimer. Anyone using red yeast rice should do so through a source with verified, consistent monacolin content and the same liver-enzyme and myopathy monitoring used for any statin.

A Deliberate Exclusion

Why Niacin Isn't on This List

Niacin (vitamin B3, at pharmacologic doses well above nutritional requirements) genuinely does improve a lipid panel: it lowers LDL and triglycerides and raises HDL more than almost anything else available, including several agents on this list. It's left out here anyway, because two large randomized outcome trials tested whether that lipid-panel improvement actually translated into fewer cardiovascular events, and both said no.

Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, et al; AIM-HIGH Investigators. "Niacin in Patients with Low HDL Cholesterol Levels Receiving Intensive Statin Therapy." New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365(24):2255-2267. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107579. PMID: 22085343. AIM-HIGH randomized 3,414 patients already on simvastatin (plus ezetimibe as needed to hold LDL at 40-80 mg/dL) to extended-release niacin or placebo. Niacin raised median HDL from 35 to 42 mg/dL, lowered triglycerides from 164 to 122 mg/dL, and lowered LDL from 74 to 62 mg/dL, exactly the lipid-panel improvement you'd expect. But the trial was stopped early, at a mean follow-up of 3 years, for lack of efficacy: the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, or coronary/cerebral revascularization) occurred in 16.4% of the niacin group versus 16.2% of the placebo group, a difference that wasn't remotely significant (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.21, P=0.79).

HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group. "Effects of Extended-Release Niacin with Laropiprant in High-Risk Patients." New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(3):203-212. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300955. PMID: 25014686. HPS2-THRIVE, a much larger trial, randomized 25,673 patients with vascular disease on background statin therapy to niacin-laropiprant or placebo. Over a median 3.9 years, LDL ran an average of 10 mg/dL lower and HDL an average of 6 mg/dL higher on niacin, again a real lipid-panel effect, but the primary outcome of major vascular events showed no significant difference (13.2% vs 13.7%, rate ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-1.03, P=0.29). Worse, niacin-laropiprant significantly increased serious adverse events across multiple categories: disturbances in diabetes control (an absolute excess of 3.7 percentage points), new-onset diabetes diagnoses (1.3 points), and serious gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, skin, infectious, and bleeding events (all P<0.001 except skin, P=0.003).

This is the clearest illustration on this entire site of a broader principle worth stating plainly: a lipid-panel number is a surrogate marker, not the outcome that actually matters to a patient, and every agent in this guide, niacin included, ultimately has to be judged by whether it changes cardiovascular events, not just a lab value. Most of the seven agents above haven't been tested against that bar either (see Honest Limits below); niacin is simply the one agent that has been tested against it directly, twice, at real scale, and not only failed to show benefit but showed net harm the second time.

Sourcing

The Ingredient Is Only Half the Answer. The Product Matters Just as Much.

Every ingredient discussed above has real evidence behind it as a compound. None of that evidence tells you anything about a specific bottle on a shelf, because dietary supplements in the United States are not reviewed by the FDA for potency, purity, or manufacturing consistency before they reach a store, the way prescription and even over-the-counter drugs are. The red yeast rice example above isn't a hypothetical: a direct laboratory test of 12 commercial products, all carrying the same label claim, found actual active-ingredient content varying more than a hundred-fold, and found a genuine contaminant in a third of them. There is no reason to assume other categories on this list are immune to the same problem; red yeast rice is simply the one where someone tested it directly and published the result.

Two things are worth looking for on a label, and worth asking your provider about directly. First, current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) compliance, a baseline manufacturing-quality standard the FDA does enforce, though enforcement is inconsistent and many products on general retail shelves are not held to it in practice. Second, independent third-party certification, most commonly an NSF mark (NSF/ANSI 173, or NSF Certified for Sport for anyone subject to drug testing) or USP Verified, both of which mean an outside laboratory has independently confirmed that what's on the label is actually what's in the capsule, at the stated dose, without unlisted contaminants. A product carrying one of these certifications has been held to a materially different standard than one that hasn't. This is exactly the kind of detail worth discussing directly with your provider rather than choosing based on price or shelf placement alone; the physiology described above assumes you're actually getting the dose the studies used, which is not something a label claim alone guarantees.

Honest Limits

What the Research Doesn't Yet Show

With one exception, every agent in this guide has evidence for changing a lipid-panel number, not for reducing heart attacks or strokes. Prescription icosapent ethyl is the exception: REDUCE-IT is a genuine outcome trial, and it showed fewer cardiovascular events, not just better numbers. Bergamot, berberine, plant sterols, psyllium, over-the-counter omega-3s, aged garlic, and red yeast rice all have real, in most cases statistically robust, effects on LDL-C or triglycerides, but none of them has been tested in a large placebo-controlled outcome trial the way statins have or the way icosapent ethyl has. That doesn't mean they don't matter: LDL-C and triglycerides are genuinely useful surrogate markers, and moving them in the right direction is a reasonable clinical goal on its own, particularly for patients who are statin-intolerant or who want to close a gap alongside statin therapy. But it does mean the honest claim for these seven agents is "improves a lipid marker with real supporting trial data," not "reduces cardiovascular risk," and niacin's outcome-trial failures above are the clearest reminder of why that distinction matters rather than a detail to skip past.

None of these agents is free of drug interactions or contraindications. Aged garlic and, to a lesser extent, omega-3 fatty acids and berberine carry real antiplatelet or bleeding-risk considerations for anyone on an anticoagulant, and REDUCE-IT itself found more atrial fibrillation and flutter hospitalizations with prescription icosapent ethyl than placebo, a real finding worth discussing for anyone with a personal or family history of AFib, not a reason to avoid the drug given its cardiovascular benefit, but a reason to monitor for it. Berberine has clinically relevant interaction potential with several drug classes through CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein pathways. Red yeast rice should be treated, medically, exactly like a statin, including the same myopathy and liver-enzyme monitoring, precisely because it is one. Any of these should be reviewed with your provider against your full medication list before starting, not chosen off a supplement-aisle shelf in isolation.

Where This Fits

How This Fits the Cellular Medicine Framework

Several of these agents converge on mechanisms this site returns to elsewhere: berberine's AMPK activation is the same cellular energy-sensing pathway targeted by metformin, and its lipid effects can't really be separated from its metabolic ones. Bergamot's overlap with statin pharmacology and red yeast rice's identity as an unregulated statin both illustrate a pattern worth naming directly: several of the most effective "natural" options in cardiometabolic medicine work through the same pathways as their pharmaceutical counterparts, not through some separate, gentler mechanism. That's not a reason to avoid them; it's a reason to treat them with the same clinical seriousness, monitoring, and attention to product quality that the pharmaceutical version would get.

A Final Note on Sourcing

Medical-Grade and Direct-to-Consumer Are Not the Same Product, Even When the Label Sounds Identical

"Medical-grade" isn't a marketing phrase here, it describes a real, verifiable difference in how a supplement is made and checked before it reaches a patient. A medical-grade product is manufactured under current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP), and its label claims are independently verified by a third party, typically through NSF, NSF Certified for Sport, or USP Verified testing, confirming that what's on the label is actually what's in the capsule, at the stated dose, without unlisted contaminants. Most of what's sold direct-to-consumer, on a general retail shelf or through an online marketplace, carries none of that independent verification, which is exactly the gap the red yeast rice study above illustrates concretely: identical label claims, over a hundred-fold difference in actual potency, and contamination in a third of the products tested.

This isn't a reason to avoid supplements that have real evidence behind them, it's a reason to be deliberate about where they come from. If you'd like help identifying a medical-grade option for any of the ingredients discussed in this guide, reach out to your provider directly, by DM, email, or at your next visit, and we can point you toward a properly certified source rather than leaving you to sort through the supplement aisle on your own.

Sources

References

Cited on This Page
  1. Gliozzi M, Walker R, Muscoli S, et al. Bergamot polyphenolic fraction enhances rosuvastatin-induced effect on LDL-cholesterol, LOX-1 expression and protein kinase B phosphorylation in patients with hyperlipidemia. Int J Cardiol. 2013;170(2):140-145. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.125 · PMID: 24239156
  2. Ju J, Li J, Lin Q, Xu H. Efficacy and safety of berberine for dyslipidaemias: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Phytomedicine. 2018;50:25-34. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2018.09.212 · PMID: 30466986
  3. Ras RT, Geleijnse JM, Trautwein EA. LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of plant sterols and stanols across different dose ranges: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(2):214-219. doi:10.1017/S0007114514000750 · PMID: 24780090 · PMCID: PMC4071994
  4. Jovanovski E, Yashpal S, Komishon A, et al. Effect of psyllium (Plantago ovata) fiber on LDL cholesterol and alternative lipid targets, non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(5):922-932. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy115 · PMID: 30239559
  5. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al; for the REDUCE-IT Investigators. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):11-22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1812792 · PMID: 30415628
  6. Eslick GD, Howe PR, Smith C, Priest R, Bensoussan A. Benefits of fish oil supplementation in hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2009;136(1):4-16. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.092 · PMID: 18774613
  7. Skulas-Ray AC, Wilson PWF, Harris WS, et al. Omega-3 Fatty Acids for the Management of Hypertriglyceridemia: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;140(12):e673-e691. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000709 · PMID: 31422671
  8. Bashiri S, TaghipourSheshdeh F, Foshati S, Askarpour M, Ahmadi A, Babajafari S. The Effect of Aged Garlic Supplementation on Blood Pressure and Lipid Profile: A Dose-Response GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Phytother Res. 2025;39(12):5669-5694. doi:10.1002/ptr.70032 · PMID: 40628369
  9. Li P, Wang Q, Chen K, et al. Red Yeast Rice for Hyperlipidemia: A Meta-Analysis of 15 High-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12:819482. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.819482 · PMID: 35111069
  10. Gordon RY, Cooperman T, Obermeyer W, Becker DJ. Marked variability of monacolin levels in commercial red yeast rice products: buyer beware! Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(19):1722-1727. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.382 · PMID: 20975018
  11. Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, et al; AIM-HIGH Investigators. Niacin in Patients with Low HDL Cholesterol Levels Receiving Intensive Statin Therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(24):2255-2267. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1107579 · PMID: 22085343
  12. HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group (Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC, et al). Effects of Extended-Release Niacin with Laropiprant in High-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(3):203-212. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1300955 · PMID: 25014686
See the Framework Applied

Explore the Rest of the Knowledge Center

Hormones, Women's Health, Men's Health, Peptides, and Metabolic Health, five practical categories, one shared framework underneath all of them.